Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Insanity and a Career in Writing


 Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

-Albert Einstein

While it perhaps wouldn’t standup to clinical scrutiny the above definition is a popular (if essentially quippy) way to understand insanity.  Another way to put this is to say that every action has an equal and opposite reaction and the reaction will be consistent if the action is repeated; to expect otherwise is insane.  According to this line of thinking Writers intent on making early story sales or recruiting a Literary Agent are (or are perhaps forced to act as though they are) insane.


Half a year ago I listened to Jeff Lindsay (Author of the bestselling Dexter series) speak at Mysterious Galaxy, my local science fiction book store.  When someone in the audience asked if he had any advice for new/aspiring Writers he said: “Learn to weld.”  He wasn’t doing this to say ‘give up on your dreams.’  Instead, he was trying to disabuse us of the notion that our writerly aspirations would provide material support in anything like a timely manner.  If I remember correctly, Mr. Lindsay spent seven years actively querying (pitching/applying) between finishing Darkly Dreaming Dexter and convincing an Agent to try and sell his work.  I’m glad that he persevered.  But frankly, I find his behavior insane.  Or to put it another way (since I am performing similar insane acts of submitting my novel and short stories for publication) I find his level of his insanity crazy.

The counter example to Jeff Lindsay is Jason Hough, a friend of mine who landed an Agent with his first query letter and now has a deal with Del Rey.


I often hear advice from Writers like myself.  That is to say: Writers with some skills, some completed work and the drive to try and make some money.  This advice tends to be incredibly superstitious.  Here’s some ‘conventional’ wisdom I’ve heard in the past month: don’t self-publish because then the establishment won’t touch you, if you can sell 1200 books on your own you can transform this into a publishing deal, don’t set your YA book series as every book is a different school year, and make sure don’t have a prologue because Agents don’t read books with prologues anymore. 

Which begs the question: with all this arrayed against the prospect of a Writer breaking through the wall of indifference, what is a Writer supposed to do?

I can't speak for others.  But my strategy is to become insane.  But do so consciously, with all the style and intelligence I can bring to bear on the task of acting like an insane person.


But I plan to do so with a twist.

My insanity is that I’m going to keep querying: dutifully repeatedly and always striving to keep the specters of doubt and disappointment at bay.  But, I will strive to bend the ‘rules’ of such an endeavor to bring attention to myself in a positive way.  At the same time, I’ll do anything else (that is both ethical and satisfying) I think might further my career.  By ‘my career’ I mean attracting and entertaining an audience with my stories in exchange for monetary support.


Even as I’m querying and receiving requests for my full manuscript, I’m seeing if I can use Kickstarter to raise funds for a first printing of my novel CHEMO.  Even as I’m trying to make my first pro short story sale and join SFWA I’m putting together an ebook anthology about all the old, weird Dungeons and Dragons monsters: Monster Missive - 1st Edition.

I frankly don’t know how I would persevere otherwise. I don’t understand how Writers who feel that the ‘only way forward’ is to spam Agents for the next decade don’t become essentially dismayed by the resounding silence.  For me, if I’m going to become insane the very least I can do is to strive to develop as many (insane) strategies as possible.    


If I have to become insane, at least I can try to keep it interesting.

3 comments:

Rich said...

Love it.

bob said...

A couple of comments:
1) What you are doing by writing and submitting is not repeating the same action over and expecting different results. Even submitting the same story to a different market is by definition not the same action, and even story you write is different from the ones have have written before. There is a study out there that says it takes 10,000 hours of practice to reach professional quality in nearly anything, and take very closely tracks to the old adage that we have a million words of crap we need to get out before we get to the good ones.
2) People who say that there is 'one' way to publishing success are wrong. There are nine and sixty ways of contrasting triable lays and all of them are right, to paraphrase Kipling, Some people go in through queries and agents, some by the slush pile, some by self-publishing, some by connections, some by breaking the rules and some by following the rules. Because it is an art and not a science they is no objectively right way.
3) rules about prologs and not writing in 2nd person and the like are there because many tools are difficult to use well, not impossible, and too many movie artists try to use tools that are beyond their skill.

J.M. Perkins said...

Bob and Rich, thanks for commenting! Makes me feel like I'm not just howling to the moon :D

Bob. As for point # 1 Yes. Technically submitting different stories or submitting to different markets is not exactly the same, that's true. Even with that being said, I still feel that ignoring the odds in the way that we (writers) do might smack a bit of insanity. I wanted to rhetorically mine the absurdity of writer perseverance/stubbornness.

However, I will add the caveat that if you REALLY want to be technical no one can do the same act more than once. The atoms involved have changed, the earth relative position in the universe has changed or maybe the participants are just wearing different underpants: it's never exactly the same. The question is, how similar does an act have to be to be considered 'the same.'

As for 2 and 3, I didn't say it was GOOD advice just that I had heard it from people; mostly 'writers' :). And I learn a lot from listening to writers, I just try to tune out the 'writers.'